From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May 13 22:30:17 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0E316A40F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 13 May 2006 22:30:17 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from aren.tyr@gawab.com)
Received: from info5.gawab.com (info5.gawab.com [204.97.230.42])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DCA643D5A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 13 May 2006 22:30:13 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from aren.tyr@gawab.com)
Received: (qmail 8662 invoked by uid 1004); 13 May 2006 22:32:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO yggdrasil) (aren.tyr@gawab.com@62.56.62.68)
	by gawab.com with SMTP; 13 May 2006 22:32:36 -0000
X-Trusted: Whitelisted
From: Aren Olvalde Tyr <aren.tyr@gawab.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:29:59 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <000301c676b3$9f398b90$6603a8c0@zeus>
In-Reply-To: <000301c676b3$9f398b90$6603a8c0@zeus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1530958.FORkBO8vSK";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200605132330.08793.aren.tyr@gawab.com>
Subject: Re: Cvsup verses Portsnap
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 22:30:17 -0000

--nextPart1530958.FORkBO8vSK
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="windows-1250"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday 13 May 2006 18:35, Tom Moore wrote:
> Hi guys.
> Which program is best for retrieving and keeping the ports tree up to dat=
e?
> What are some pros and cons of each approach?
> Is one method better than the other?

Both systems are very efficient and work extremely well, so you won't go to=
o=20
far wrong with either. However, I believe Portsnap has the edge and uses le=
ss=20
bandwidth.

Keeping your Ports tree up to date with Portsnap is as simple as

#portsnap fetch && portsnap update

Aren.

--nextPart1530958.FORkBO8vSK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBEZl3woWGxb6IQ4B4RAr9mAJ4hXbFydoFgVSRsyqRUItrUpdbAJACgm4kI
KovQmJCHPDVkl5oWugV3e70=
=MEew
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1530958.FORkBO8vSK--