Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 16:11:55 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: dyson@freebsd.org Cc: terry@lambert.org, dyson@celebration.net, dg@Root.COM, bde@zeta.org.au, proff@suburbia.net, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: attribute/inode caching Message-ID: <199609172311.QAA05000@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199609172214.RAA03292@dyson.iquest.net> from "John S. Dyson" at Sep 17, 96 05:14:42 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I have saved the original correspondence (or you can look it up in the > > -current list archives, which I suggest you do so that there is no question > > of me biasing the information) where we originally discussed the vclean > > interface. In it, you claimed that device/extent and vnode/extent > > mapping were irreconcilable because the device/extent mapping would > > cause a reduction in the mappable region down to 2^31, the max filesize > > (clearly, 31 pages == 4096/512 + 31 bits of blocks -- the origin of the 39). > > > maxfilesize is in units of bytes, right? Yes. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609172311.QAA05000>