From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 28 18:09:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE2816A408 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:09:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E4943ED8 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:09:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72A260EB; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:09:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wMGbhat-stIG; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:09:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [199.103.21.238] (pan.codefab.com [199.103.21.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80385DA7; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:09:05 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <44A2BF19.6090105@utdallas.edu> References: <44A2BF19.6090105@utdallas.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <2DC9746C-8DAA-4231-8A40-23C6BCEF62EC@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:09:04 -0400 To: Paul Schmehl X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: How do I include two patches for the same file? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:09:07 -0000 On Jun 28, 2006, at 1:40 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > I'm the maintainer for security/sancp. > > Recently a new patch was released that patches the decode.cc file. > A previous, still valid, patch, *also* patches the decode.cc file. > If I include both patches, the make fails with an error about > decode.cc You ought to merge the patches into a single set of changes which is consistent. -- -Chuck