From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 12 09:50:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D3016A4CE for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:50:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6401B43D2F for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:50:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nkinkade@fastmail.fm) X-Sasl-enc: De7JsuWYuyKbFfviauwXyQ 1079113250 Received: from [206.26.199.146] (unknown [206.27.244.214]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14319722F4D; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:40:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from nkinkade by [206.26.199.146] with local (Exim 4.12) id 1B1qe4-000ExB-00; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:40:28 -0600 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:40:28 -0600 From: Nathan Kinkade To: "Shaun T. Erickson" , Matthew Seaman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040312174028.GW858@nkinkade.bmp.ub> Mail-Followup-To: "Shaun T. Erickson" , Matthew Seaman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <404E9061.3050805@ste-land.com> <20040310103622.GA49215@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <404F324B.1000803@ste-land.com> <20040312170842.GB72483@voyager.swabbies.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="McQJJYUzjTUqtsGv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040312170842.GB72483@voyager.swabbies.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: Nathan Kinkade Subject: Re: ntpd question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nathan Kinkade List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:50:08 -0000 --McQJJYUzjTUqtsGv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:08:42AM -0800, Joshua Lokken wrote: > * Shaun T. Erickson [2004-03-12 08:27]: > > Matthew Seaman wrote: > >=20 > > >Unfortuately if you're going to run ntpd, you can't get rid of these: > > >ntpd(8) will automatically bind to all interfaces on the system, and > > >there are no controls within ntpd to control that. > >=20 > > Darn. Thanks for the suggestions! I was already controlling access to= =20 > > the port with my ipfilter firewall, and will continue to do so. I just= =20 > > believe in not letting anything bind to a port, that isn't required to. > >=20 >=20 > If you're just keeping one machine's clock in sync, > you could try using ntpdate rather than ntpd. >=20 > --=20 > Joshua It is my understanding that ntpdate is deprecated and one should use nptd with the '-q' option instead. Nathan --=20 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys D8527E49 --McQJJYUzjTUqtsGv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAUfYMO0ZIEthSfkkRAkrLAKDCsrbV+GXqCaATOkY6uKNcbmZ/zACgrMh1 lbHYQAh8x3BTd9F6u6iQNEU= =SutA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --McQJJYUzjTUqtsGv--