From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 11 21:36:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 664) id 8678B16A4CF; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:36:40 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:36:40 +0000 From: David O'Brien To: Jeff Roberson Message-ID: <20050111213640.GA88223@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20041213054007.Y9536@mail.chesapeake.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041213054007.Y9536@mail.chesapeake.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.11-RC2 Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP VFS Last call X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:36:40 -0000 On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 05:46:32AM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote: > The SMP FFS/VFS patch has undergone several iterations and lots of serious > testing over the past few weeks. Many people, especially Peter Holm, have > sent me good bug reports. It's currently running on the port build > cluster and I have done extended load testing in small memory > configurations. What this means is, after I get back from vacation, it's > going to go into the tree. If you don't test it now, you will be in a few > weeks. :-) > > http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/smpffs.diff Hi Jeff, Can you please commit this ASAP? It seems to be working very well. There are now conflicts between your patch and PHK's 2005 work. It has gotten to the point that testing this patch set is going to become too hard and the testers will have to revert to stock sources. Thanks! -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)