From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 19 21:24:45 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A2D16A41F
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:24:45 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no)
Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A87043D5A
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:24:42 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no)
Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59])
	by osl1smout1.broadpark.no
	(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004))
	with ESMTP id <0ITC00KWDZPWGF80@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for
	freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:29:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from kg-work.kg4.no ([80.202.172.166]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no
	(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004))
	with SMTP id <0ITC00AYPZLEX300@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for
	freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:27:14 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:24:42 +0100
From: Torfinn Ingolfsen <torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no>
X-Face: "t9w2,-X@O^I`jVW\sonI3.,36KBLZE*AL[y9lL[PyFD*r_S:dIL9c[8Y>V42R0"!"yb_zN,f#%.[PYYNq;
	m"_0v;
	~rUM2Yy!zmkh)3&U|u!=<N>T(zyv,MHJv"nDH>OJ`t(@mil461d_B'Uo|'nMwlKe0Mv=kvV?Nh@>Hb<3s_z2jYgZhPb@?Wi^x1a~Hplz1.zH
In-reply-to: <01e301c61d38$d9898400$0a0a0a0a@aus.pervasive.com>
To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Message-id: <20060119222442.14f1a9b0.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <200601191434.21352.loox@e-shell.net>
	<01e301c61d38$d9898400$0a0a0a0a@aus.pervasive.com>
Subject: Re: linux-o-lator
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:24:45 -0000

On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:42:22 -0600
Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> wrote:

> > This should force the port to look for i386 rpms
> it works fine as Brooks suggested in another mail standalone outside 
> of portupgrade(1).
> 
> So, it apparently is an oddity in the portupgrade environment.
> 
> linprocfs is NOT mounted, fwiw.  
> 
> Should I send-pr this?

This should already have been fixed, see
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=90252
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80679

Isn't that patch merged, or doesn't it work?
-- 
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen,
Norway