From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 4 06:48:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8759916A4CE for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 06:48:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406E843D41 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 06:48:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i846meZP031009; Fri, 3 Sep 2004 23:48:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200409040648.i846meZP031009@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 23:48:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis To: scrappy@hub.org In-Reply-To: <20040904003116.J812@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org cc: keramida@linux.gr Subject: Re: what is fsck's "slowdown"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 06:48:49 -0000 On 4 Sep, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Long shot here, but is this a change that could be MFC'd to 4.x? Or has > fsck changed so much since that it could only be done in 5.x? I would certainly think so.