From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 23 18:52:24 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E01FAB07
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:52:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1F3514DC
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:52:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-64-237.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.64.237])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A01F03CD44;
 Thu, 23 Apr 2015 20:52:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t3NIqLBl001950;
 Thu, 23 Apr 2015 20:52:21 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de)
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 20:52:21 +0200
From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To: nightrecon@hotmail.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ufs snapshot help
Message-Id: <20150423205221.dd336e2a.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <mhbe4v$gd3$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <CAKE2PDuSGsrf7mHfd2zo-BJAhsOL4KDKTmdROBwtJKeFrvWCBw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKoxK+7brXXBE=JxPQHm06a2SEMiGC7k3eF95o7aQ90Hi__3Fg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKE2PDudJ57mWhPKU7XhEz85QG1Gywxt8U=sW1i7T6Nf269h3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <mhbe4v$gd3$1@ger.gmane.org>
Reply-To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Organization: EDVAX
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:52:25 -0000

On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:37:16 -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
> jungle Boogie wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> > 
> > 
> > You're correct. New installs of FreeBSD don't seem to setup separate
> > partitions. Did they ever?
> > 
> [snip]
> 
> Huh? The default 'auto guided default' of installing everything into a 
> single / partition is only a fairly recent occurrence.

If I remember correctly, ye olde sysinstall did also create
several partitions for functional separation when the 'a' key
(auto) was being used.



> The manual approach 
> for those who know how to slice and partition is still viable, even to 
> include the choice of GPT or ancient Dos-friendly Mbr. Historically separate 
> partitions were the norm back in the day.

Putting different functional parts on separate partitions
comes with advantages and disadvantages: advantages include
the ability to use dump + restore, the "noexec" mount option,
the protection against runaway processes to fill / (or to
make /home unwritable by creating big files in /tmp or /var),
or "switching" between different versions by mounting them;
disadvantages include the problem of "device is full" and
the trouble of resizing them.

With GPT, the partitioning approach is even easier as there
is no need to decide about slicing (if or if not, "dedicated"),
and there are more than 7 partitions (total) possible.


-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...