From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 20 13:04:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E653106566C for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:04:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6478FC1E for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from sarevok.dnr.servegame.org (mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991B97E837; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 05:04:23 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:04:21 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (FreeBSD/8.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.2.2; i386; ; ) References: <20090420125955.GA1750@phenom.cordula.ws> In-Reply-To: <20090420125955.GA1750@phenom.cordula.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904201504.22035.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Wojciech Puchar , cpghost Subject: Re: Dump | Restore X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:04:25 -0000 On Monday 20 April 2009 14:59:55 cpghost wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:46:05PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > use rsh not ssh unless you really need encryption. > > Sure, you *could* do that, but be sure to encrypt *and* sign the > backup stream beforehand, e.g. using openssl or gnupg... And even > then, anyone sniffing that poorly encrypted (at layer 2) wireless LAN > connection could still hijack the password, log into the backup host, > and delete or corrupt the (encrypted) dump files. > > Perhaps it's better to use ssh anyway, even for encrypted and signed > dump files. Creating and transfering a couple of key files to the > clients and backup host and using ssh(1) is not hard. Really not. ;-) But doesn't use full network capacity. Closed circuit LAN's (yes, they still do exist) don't need ssh, but a level 0 dump of several TB of data does need full lan speed. -- Mel