From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Dec 20 04:06:56 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA16687
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 04:06:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA16682
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 04:06:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id EAA00587; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 04:06:49 -0800
To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: pcnfsd.. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 20 Dec 1995 03:37:01 PST."
             <199512201137.DAA03249@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> 
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 04:06:48 -0800
Message-ID: <585.819461208@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

It makes enabling it in /etc/sysconfig a one step operation.  I can
live with it being a two-stepper, but I can't always count on access
to the package collection.. :-(

					Jordan

>  * If it moves, so does samba and that DHCP daemon that I keep hearing about 
8)
>  * I'd say that they get an awful lot more use than pcnfsd. (Or would if 
>  * people knew about them 8)
> 
> Hmm.
> 
> Jordan, can you please explain why it can't be happy as a
> port/package?  I can't understand why putting it in the main
> distribution is going to win over a binary package, which is even on
> the CD!
> 
> Satoshi