From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 19 16:43:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D201D16A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:43:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fly.ebs.gr (fly.ebs.gr [62.103.84.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA9143D49 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:43:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from ebs.gr (root@hal.ebs.gr [10.1.1.2]) by fly.ebs.gr (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j0JGhWLc061100; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:43:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from [10.1.1.200] (pptp.ebs.gr [10.1.1.200]) by ebs.gr (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0JGhSJJ067401; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:43:31 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.300 [265.7.0]); Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:43:19 +0200 Message-ID: <41EE8E27.1010301@ebs.gr> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:43:19 +0200 From: Panagiotis Astithas Organization: EBS Ltd. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Zelkin References: <20050119142601.GA75697@phantom.cris.net> In-Reply-To: <20050119142601.GA75697@phantom.cris.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] ia64/sparc64 jdk 1.5.0 ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:43:40 -0000 Alexey Zelkin wrote: > Gentelmen, > > I'd like to listen about people opinion -- DO WE NEED ia64 and/or sparc64 > PORT OF JDK15 ? Please take it as little survey, and post your thoughts > privately or to mailing list. I'm not sure either should be high-priority items, but if I had to choose one, I'd go for sparc64. I know of a few places that might consider deploying FreeBSD on oldish sparc64 hardware for Java server applications. This is a scenario that makes sense from a business perspective: old SPARC systems tend to be replaced by commoditized Intel/AMD hardware and the decommissioned boxes could retain some value with zero cost, by installing FreeBSD and being used as backup systems in high availability configurations, or in a server farm/grid. Thanks for the excellent work!