From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 15 10:04:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8FF1065674 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 10:04:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.server1.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [82.193.243.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9B78FC0A for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 10:04:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (HSI-KBW-109-192-071-045.hsi6.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de [109.192.71.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.server1.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E6E47E92D; Sun, 15 May 2011 12:04:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4DCFA53C.1020806@bsdforen.de> Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 12:04:44 +0200 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101212 Thunderbird/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oliver Pinter References: <4DCDAD36.5080007@bsdforen.de> <4DCDCF1B.3060300@uiowa.edu> <4DCE665A.50907@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG_8 does not build with CPUTYPE=core2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 10:04:47 -0000 On 15/05/2011 04:18, Oliver Pinter wrote: > in two step you can elliminate the warning message: > 1) compile and install world and kernel with commented CPUTYPE in make.conf > 2) uncomment the CPUTYPE line, and recompile world and kernel > > the problem is, the build system based on newer (4.2.2) gcc, and when > you set CPUTYPE=core2 than substitute -march=core2 in gcc parameter > list, but older base system cc (4.2.1) do not knows this option or > value. Top-posted and redundant. Scott already posted the workaround. At this point a FIX would be useful. Thank you! -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?