From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Apr 24 03:23:15 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id DAA06259
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 03:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id DAA06253
          Wed, 24 Apr 1996 03:23:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP
	id m0uC1j4-0003viC; Wed, 24 Apr 96 03:23 PDT
Received: from localhost.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA10844; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 10:23:06 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost.tfs.com didn't use HELO protocol
To: sos@FreeBSD.org
cc: current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD current)
Subject: Re: Anybody playe with ip_filter ?? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 24 Apr 1996 11:51:03 +0200."
             <199604240951.LAA06582@ra.dkuug.dk> 
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 10:23:05 +0000
Message-ID: <10842.830341385@critter.tfs.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> I seems it'll do what I need, anybody got any experience before
> I dig in, and should we put in the patches in the kernel, making
> it easy to use ??

I have talked with the author, and we kind of agreed to get it in.

The present kernel interface to ipfw should fit ip_filter fine,
and we should have no need to modify it further I think...

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.