From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Mar 22 14:25:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from emu.capnet.state.tx.us (mail.capnet.state.tx.us [204.65.39.248]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3DF152F8 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 14:25:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Bryan.Bradsby@capnet.state.tx.us) Received: from localhost (bbradsby@localhost) by emu.capnet.state.tx.us (8.9.2/8.9.2+CL3.12.19990305) with SMTP id QAA20141; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 16:28:10 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 16:28:10 -0600 (CST) From: Bryan Bradsby To: Chris Shenton Cc: Wayne Self , Mark Conway Wirt , Michael Moran , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: E-Mail size limitation by ISPs In-Reply-To: <87iubxno4o.fsf@Thanatos.Shenton.Org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 19 Mar 1999, Chris Shenton wrote: > "Wayne Self" writes: > > > PROCMAIL_MAILER_MAX [undefined] If set, the maximum size message that will > > be accepted by the procmail mailer. > > > > Does anyone know how to set this? It looks as if you can do this > > even without using procmail as your local transport agent. but i > > could be totaly wrong. You can set up multiple local delivery agents and have different limits (per message) on each. The trick is to pick the right agent for each customer. IIRC this could be done in a mailertable, but could be wrong. > I haven't done it yet, but noticed that in the Procmail districbution > there's a readme twhich talks about integrating Procmail with sendmail > for improved performance and security. Take a look. We do this here. We use procmail as our local delivery agent. Have not seen a performance hit using procmail, and this enables filtering mail with .procmailrc Have not set up per user quotas yet, but have considered it. HTH -bryan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message