From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 20:12:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033F5106566B for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 20:12:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deeptech71@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804C48FC14 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 20:12:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaaf13 with SMTP id f13so2065693eaa.13 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:11:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of deeptech71@gmail.com designates 10.14.99.2 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.14.99.2; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of deeptech71@gmail.com designates 10.14.99.2 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=deeptech71@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=deeptech71@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.14.99.2]) by 10.14.99.2 with SMTP id w2mr14295373eef.69.1331064714817 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:11:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PKePrrJD25/I6j/HjqhgoYGOZqc/YwbQ8tWrUmxvPEA=; b=d68yIEny97U0U/a0uHfKqyvHrOSesYDPO9VxJhWSQMmp4Cd2YaRnXZQ/0lKlK3mxi9 rZ7A83R9SpIoJKSoh/+usRv6NCDjVVD79WsgTqIWAzUIzHeMfhHUgU3HQ99sPtATA/YC bvgK3GsYwbSlZFRy5+jZtpM1l2QSbDVv4H1Zl3/cOYWZnhVX/OCsL7AD4nCln3ZMjmTN pnapIXaKRoWdeq02i2Pt69pe1kQpve2/CyfYUN/JLab7ZFdb4jpj3Lwj84ICdPw4gmHw Qu6VHg1wdIh3SXrs1ieKZAWrzS1qz7DaO3akSK2qQu44iOq8S4hrA0d0djflv7GjIgPB dD7w== Received: by 10.14.99.2 with SMTP id w2mr10892381eef.69.1331064714701; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:11:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.80] (dsl4E5C3DF1.pool.t-online.hu. [78.92.61.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w9sm7084142eei.8.2012.03.06.12.11.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:11:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F567095.90002@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:16:21 +0100 From: deeptech71@gmail.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120229 Firefox/10.0.2 SeaMonkey/2.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <4F50CE89.6010009@gmail.com> <20120302210810.c67d3030.ray@ddteam.net> <4F512BB0.9070202@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F512BB0.9070202@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: SeaMonkey eats the CPU as of r232144 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:12:03 -0000 deeptech71@gmail.com wrote: > Although generally, the property that SeaMonkey's CPU usage slowly > converges (instead of snapping) to 0 is WRONG, and that can be confirmed > by the fact that on FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE (as reported by someone) and > Windows XP, SeaMonkey's CPU usage is snappy. That's another semi-false alarm. I've just found out that top(1) displays some sort of moving average in the WCPU/CPU field. D: