From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 27 15:03:37 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2843F10656F8
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:03:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rick@kiwi-computer.com)
Received: from kiwi-computer.com (keira.kiwi-computer.com [63.224.10.3])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD0B08FC14
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:03:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rick@kiwi-computer.com)
Received: (qmail 59817 invoked by uid 2001); 27 Apr 2009 15:03:34 -0000
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:03:34 -0500
From: "Rick C. Petty" <rick-freebsd2008@kiwi-computer.com>
To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
Message-ID: <20090427150334.GA59796@keira.kiwi-computer.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0904261651460.4478@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca>
	<20090426210343.GA51829@keira.kiwi-computer.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.63.0904261813260.16667@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca>
	<20090427135200.GA59201@keira.kiwi-computer.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.63.0904271049160.17193@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0904271049160.17193@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why do some ufs i-node fields have 2 copies?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: rick-freebsd2008@kiwi-computer.com
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:03:37 -0000

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:58:43AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
> 
> 
> Oops, poorly expressed. What I meant to say was "doesn't really add 
> anything to
> the line of code I listed in the original message":
> 
> 	DIP_SET(ip, i_modrev, DIP(ip, i_modrev) + 1);
> 
> since that is the only time i_modrev is manipulated. (I didn't mean "doesn't
> add anything to the code, in general".)

<snip>

> Does it make sense this time?

Yes, that makes total sense.

-- Rick C. Petty