From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 17 08:08:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8E9116 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 08:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alonsoschaich@fastmail.fm) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BB732B39 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 08:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1822124A for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 04:00:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 17 Aug 2013 04:00:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mesmtp; bh=iMHIJgQS2FHE/V3QZYFD0Z087Ck=; b=D20jQEp1m98lToRKqalxO/6frG0l +cwlo10xYls0phWIGe2BZSPXN2Eqyd0gmKSJrYwwvC0DMGKJxXnyVUVCO5dR5kn1 QJC3H1YvoRlo8fiiz2DI6x5YoudvuE6TVbILZqnTlJAEd80MwKiCYoDL2RMBrF/1 A8jblqAg5jK1ZQM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=iMHIJgQS2FHE/V3QZYFD0Z 087Ck=; b=px+2PKNG6PEq2HIU1OtB6uHdPxI/tXQcXZinSKJMQUhX30aZoYo/Sb 2QBUGcMbJgSphwF2bVrcgAc80LAYmDjb9zFsiMDoSITbznn+TSOG+0ixSuytYUOl DrIhq7eMCEQtvTbtlVDEr64hiOqi74WukBfmzpKEDsWAiRDophLNU= X-Sasl-enc: NXotYbpZT22bhhlH+VrDEeFQX1Qm1onzXrenuo4uhvJD 1376726439 Received: from inet-0afeef15.localnet.edu (unknown [141.87.213.55]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CD3DF680191 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 04:00:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 10:00:38 +0200 From: Schaich Alonso To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FBSD 9.2 RC crashes running as virtualbox host Message-Id: <20130817100038.fa377ae6fb6bc9ba4c18699f@fastmail.fm> In-Reply-To: References: <520E2DDD.6050900@zenker.tk> <520E2FC8.7010305@zenker.tk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 08:08:23 -0000 On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 00:38:48 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Oberman > > wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Warren Block wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Thomas Zenker wrote: > >>> > >>> On 08/16/13 15:41, Mikhail Tsatsenko wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> 2013/8/16 Thomas Zenker : > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> after updating my freebsd amd64 box from 9.1 (r250841) to 9.2-RC > >>>>>> (r254276) virtualbox crashes the machine. Seconds after starting VBOX > >>>>>> > >>>>> After starting VBOX gui or guest machine? If first, try to rebuild > >>>>> userland portion of vbox too. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> After starting a virtual guest machine in the GUI or directly > >>>> from cli > >>>> leads to the crash. The userland has been rebuild w/ 9.2 also. The same > >>>> binaries of the userland portion built with 9.2 work w/o problems in > >>>> 9.1. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Updated to 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r254408 amd64 today, rebuilt and reloaded > >>> the VirtualBox kernel module, and just started a couple of guests from > >>> the GUI with no problems. > >>> > >> > >> Updated to r254416 today.Two crashes when I tried starting VirtualBox > >> 4.16_2. I have both dumps and they ere very different. The first was a > >> "spin lock held too long" and the second was a general protection fault. > >> Both occurred when I attempted to start a saved Windows 7 VM. > >> > >> FreeBSD rogue.local 9.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r254416M: > >> Fri Aug 16 11:27:20 PDT 2013 > >> root@rogue.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > >> > >> #0 doadump (textdump=) at pcpu.h:234 > >> 234 pcpu.h: No such file or directory. > >> in pcpu.h > >> (kgdb) #0 doadump (textdump=) at pcpu.h:234 > >> #1 0xffffffff80915c66 in kern_reboot (howto=260) > >> at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:449 > >> #2 0xffffffff80916167 in panic (fmt=0x1
) > >> at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:637 > >> #3 0xffffffff80cfae80 in trap_fatal (frame=0x9, eva= >> out>) > >> at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/trap.c:879 > >> #4 0xffffffff80cfb691 in trap (frame=0xffffff8124900830) > >> at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/trap.c:605 > >> #5 0xffffffff80ce4ac3 in calltrap () > >> at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:232 > >> #6 0xffffffff80b86015 in vm_map_entry_splay (addr=984915968, > >> root=0xfffffe002c9af200) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:832 > >> #7 0xffffffff80b870f7 in vm_map_lookup_entry (map=0xfffffe007535b640, > >> address=984915968, entry=0xffffff8124900970) > >> at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:1080 > >> #8 0xffffffff80b8a5cc in vm_map_madvise (map=0xfffffe007535b640, > >> start=984915968, end=985440256, behav=5) at > >> /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:2050 > >> #9 0xffffffff80b8d9e3 in sys_madvise (td=0xfffffe000549e920, > >> uap=) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_mmap.c:760 > >> #10 0xffffffff80cfa62a in amd64_syscall (td=0xfffffe000549e920, traced=0) > >> at subr_syscall.c:135 > >> #11 0xffffffff80ce4da7 in Xfast_syscall () > >> at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:391 > >> #12 0x000000002ce13dcc in ?? () > >> Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) > >> > >> I can make the cores and text dumps available. kmod was rebuilt after > >> the upgrade. > >> > > > > Just confirmed that 254050 works fine. Trying 354162 and will continue > > binary hunt till I find it. > > > > I am now up to 254270, at the point of the original failure report. I now > suspect I may have botched the kmod re-install on my original failure. I am > calling it quits of the night now, but will finish tests tomorrow morning. > The updates are pretty few and far between between 270 and the present. Hi, I am using r254095 and my system also resets when trying to start a Guest in VirtualBox, so the breaking update is probably between 254050 and 254270. Alonso