From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Sun May 20 10:59:21 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54307EB1735; Sun, 20 May 2018 10:59:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3FB47AEA6; Sun, 20 May 2018 10:59:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id E1CA6173AD; Sun, 20 May 2018 10:59:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 10:59:20 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mark Johnston Cc: Matthew Macy , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers , Ed Maste Subject: Re: svn commit: r333872 - head/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/tools/ctf/cvt Message-ID: <20180520105920.GA30998@FreeBSD.org> References: <201805190631.w4J6VHhr094225@repo.freebsd.org> <20180519194437.GA21485@raichu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180519194437.GA21485@raichu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 10:59:21 -0000 On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 03:44:37PM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote: > ... > I don't really think it's important. The main consideration is the > toolchain. We use illumos as an upstream, which is pretty inactive at > this point. Joyent's illumos fork has put a lot of work into the CTF > toolchain, and OpenBSD has made some progress towards an ISC-licensed > ctfconvert utility. I'd like to import the latter, since the permissive > license means that we can use it in DDB. It requires more work because > of some missing functionality, though. > > At some point I think we'd like to pursue one of these two upstreams, Quick reality check question: why aren't *we* (FreeBSD) upstream, since Sun was killed by Oracle and we're more alive than illumos and OpenBSD? ./danfe