From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Dec 8 17: 1:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852AB37B405; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 17:01:43 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) id fB911BB87688; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 17:01:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 17:01:11 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200112090101.fB911BB87688@apollo.backplane.com> To: Nate Williams Cc: Kirk McKusick , Robert Watson , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch for auto-default value for maxusers References: <200112071957.fB7Jvef29774@beastie.mckusick.com> <200112082256.fB8MuwL19001@apollo.backplane.com> <200112082340.fB8NeI329704@apollo.backplane.com> <15378.46638.217290.407771@caddis.yogotech.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG : :> This patch is against -stable. : :Minor nit... Yes, well, you can blame -current's buildkernel mechanism for not rebuilding config, buildworld not being able to handle -DNOCLEAN without barfing, and the whole fraggin build mechanism for not being able to build one fragging -current binary on a -stable machine. :> - maxusers = up->u_default; :> + /* printf("maxusers not specified; will auto-size\n"); */ :> + maxusers = 0; : :Isn't this line kind of redundant, since we already know that maxusers == 0? Yah. It's just a preliminary patch. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message