Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 Apr 1999 12:47:12 +1200
From:      Joe Abley <jabley@clear.co.nz>
To:        Andrew Reilly <andrew@lake.com.au>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, jabley@clear.co.nz
Subject:   Re: Adding desktop support
Message-ID:  <19990429124712.A82488@clear.co.nz>
In-Reply-To: <19990429093602.A35123@gurney.reilly.home>; from Andrew Reilly on Thu, Apr 29, 1999 at 09:36:02AM %2B1000
References:  <199904282017.NAA01044@dingo.cdrom.com>; <19990429083638.B34373.kithrup.freebsd.hackers@gurney.reilly.home> <199904282244.PAA28325@kithrup.com> <19990429112538.D81921@clear.co.nz> <19990429093602.A35123@gurney.reilly.home>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 29, 1999 at 09:36:02AM +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 1999 at 11:25:38AM +1200, Joe Abley wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 03:44:47PM -0700, Sean Eric Fagan wrote:
> > > Putting icons in the executable itself is pretty stupid -- it's a single
> > > instance of something that a window manager can use, and there are much
> > > less-invasive ways of doing the same thing.
> > 
> > What's invasive about it?
> 
> It breaks the multi-user ownership/protection model.
> 
> Regarding your comment about PGP signatures: the reason that we
> don't need them is that for someone to be able to modify a (system)
> executable on FreeBSD, they have to already be root on your system.
> If they're root, they can do anything.

They can't easily fake a PGP signature without access to the private key,
though. I was assuming that the private key would expressly not be kept
on a local fixed volume.


Joe



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990429124712.A82488>