From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 00:09:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E1516A406; Tue, 9 May 2006 00:09:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jb@what-creek.com) Received: from what-creek.com (what-creek.com [66.111.37.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3237843D46; Tue, 9 May 2006 00:09:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jb@what-creek.com) Received: by what-creek.com (Postfix, from userid 102) id 5ADDE78C1F; Tue, 9 May 2006 00:09:29 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 00:09:29 +0000 From: John Birrell To: Daniel Eischen Message-ID: <20060509000928.GA81282@what-creek.com> References: <445FB11C.1000309@samsco.org> <20060508.174813.89129442.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shared library version bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 00:09:31 -0000 On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 07:59:52PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > For libraries with symbol versioning, yes, that's the plan. > To date, that's libc, libm, libthr, libpthread, and libthread_db. > If other libraries become symbol versioned after 7.0 gets > released, then those libraries will need another version > bump. This is a bit off-topic, but we need "mutex/rwlock held" functions in libpthread. DTrace wants them. 8-) -- John Birrell