From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jan 20 6:11:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from clmboh1-smtp3.columbus.rr.com (unknown [65.24.0.112]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1CA37B69B for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 06:11:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.iowna.com (dhcp065-024-023-038.columbus.rr.com [65.24.23.38]) by clmboh1-smtp3.columbus.rr.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f0KE8h727012; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 09:08:43 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3A699BD6.71986D2D@mail.iowna.com> Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 09:08:22 -0500 From: Bill Moran X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Meyer Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I am confused about tracking stable References: <14953.14800.302302.403387@guru.mired.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Meyer wrote: > > Bill Moran types: > > The reason I use it is for updating my production servers. I have a test > > machine that I update to the latest -STABLE, and then test for a week. > > If everything goes fine, I then upgrade any production servers I want to > > upgrade to that EXACT version that I tested (using date tags.) Paranoid, > > I know, but I'm too lazy to fix things after the fact. > > I think that's intelligent, not paranoid. However, I wonder about > using cvsup and date tags to update the other systems. Wouldn't it be > a little easier/faster/etc. to do the nfs buildworld/installworld > split thing that's been discussed here, or rdist the source tree from > the test machine to the other machines? Yes, that's planned soon. Just haven't had time to set it up yet. -Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message