Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:09:59 -0500 (CDT) From: "Sean C. Farley" <scf@FreeBSD.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Versioning question for linux-ut port Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.0.9999.0710160952520.1342@thor.farley.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have been working with Martin Tournoij, who did the hard work, on updating the linux-ut port to support different versions of UT99 (GOTY, Anthology, etc.). He also discovered that the v451 patch had issues with the keyboard. After a little reading on my part, I found that in most cases the v451 patch was more suited for servers while v436 was best on clients with both being network compatible. Here is the question: how should the port's version information be configured to have v436 be the default with v451 (WITH_451PATCH) as an option? With PORTVERSION set back to 436 from 451, does PORTEPOCH need to be set to 1? I am uncertain since the port will support both versions. Would PORTREVISION=1 be better than using PORTEPOCH since if the user wanted to stay with v451, the install may be a little different anyway? Here is the latest port of linux-ut[1]. Sean 1. http://www.farley.org/freebsd/tmp/linux-ut-port.tar.bz2 -- scf@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.0.9999.0710160952520.1342>