From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 27 23:52:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail.kebne.se (mail.kebne.se [212.209.134.151]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E6837B719 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 23:52:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gunnar.olsson@xelerated.com) Received: by mail.kebne.se with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 09:52:51 +0200 Message-ID: <31A473DBB655D21180850008C71E251A031AAEDB@mail.kebne.se> From: Gunnar Olsson To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: tunnel question Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 09:52:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi there, I have configured a logical ethernet interface, so called a tap interface (tap0). I have also managed to bridged that interface to my "real" ethernet interface (rl0) and it works fine. Now to my question. Is it possible to "tunnel" my tap interface including the ip and ethernet header into a new ip and ethernet header, see figure below. ---------------------------------|-------------|---------------|-----------| ------------| | data | ip(tap0) | eth(tap0) | ip(rl0) | eth(rl0) | ---------------------------------|-------------|---------------|-----------| ------------| It is almost as a tun interface, but I would like to keep the layer 2(ARP handling) with the logical interface, that's why I want to use the tap interface and not the tun interface. Any idea have to make this to work appreciates a lot! Best Regards, Gunnar ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Gunnar Olsson Phone: +46 8 5062 5762 Xelerated Packet Devices AB Fax: +46 8 5455 3211 Regeringsgatan 67 Mobile: +46 73 3279765 SE-10386 Stockholm Web: http://www.xelerated.com Email: mailto:gunnar.olsson@xelerated.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message