Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:52:06 +0100
From:      =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To:        Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Is it possible to make subr_acl_nfs4 and subr_acl_posix1e disabled?
Message-ID:  <86ehv8xze1.fsf@ds4.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomAX7cBuOfUgEW0UXcQ87Zie1_3Oad2rir5v97iEhKuCw@mail.gmail.com> (Adrian Chadd's message of "Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:30:31 -0800")
References:  <CAJ-Vmo=qNu9KpF6kSofychNcjwexFKvAT8bnwd3gVr-VPymN5w@mail.gmail.com> <86ty4a8mc3.fsf@ds4.des.no> <CAJ-VmomAX7cBuOfUgEW0UXcQ87Zie1_3Oad2rir5v97iEhKuCw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> writes:
> Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes:
> > I would be very annoyed if it were no longer possible to netboot
> > GENERIC...
> I don't want to break that. :) I Just don't want to compile it in
> unless I'm using NFS/ZFS, and on my 4MB flash boards I'm not booting
> w/ NFS compiled in statically..

Sorry, I just realized that I read the text of your message but not the
subject; I thought you were proposing to remove NFS from GENERIC.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ehv8xze1.fsf>