From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Feb 25 8:43:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from po4.wam.umd.edu (po4.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E4437B4EC for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 08:43:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from culverk@wam.umd.edu) Received: from rac2.wam.umd.edu (IDENT:root@rac2.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.142]) by po4.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA04460; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 11:43:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from rac2.wam.umd.edu (IDENT:sendmail@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rac2.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA03022; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 11:43:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (culverk@localhost) by rac2.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA03018; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 11:43:38 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: rac2.wam.umd.edu: culverk owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 11:43:38 -0500 (EST) From: Kenneth Wayne Culver To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: simond@irrelevant.org, Justin McKnight , FreeBSD-newbies Subject: Re: Compaq e500, 3com cardbus card help In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG What I was saying is that cardbus only works on current. ================================================================= | Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best NT upgrade | | Unix Systems Administrator | ICQ #: 24767726 | | and student at The | AIM: muythaibxr | | The University of Maryland, | Website: (Under Construction) | | College Park. | http://www.wam.umd.edu/~culverk/| ================================================================= On 25 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Kenneth Wayne Culver writes: > > On 24 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > Kenneth Wayne Culver writes: > > > > FreeBSD supports cardbus in -CURRENT, but I wouldn't expect it to ever > > > > support cardbus in 4.x. If you are daring you can get -CURRENT, but from > > > > what I hear right now, it's not working very well. > > > It works just fine, thank you very much, but it takes some > > > hand-holding. > > Must not be cardbus then. > > I beg your pardon? Were you trying to say that -CURRENT does not work > very well, or that Cardbus does not work very well? I assumed the > former, which is partly true (-CURRENT works fine if you keep close > enough track of things to know when it's safe to upgrade and how to > fix or work around whatever bugs you hit). If you meant the latter, I > beg to differ - Cardbus itself works fine and dandy for me. > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message