From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 18 00:08:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E9616A41C for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:08:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F381243D1F; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:08:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (davidxu@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5I08Bae078761; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:08:12 GMT (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <42B365E1.6050501@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:08:01 +0800 From: David Xu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050605 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jarrod Martin References: <20050604234246.G69694@zoraida.natserv.net> <200506071749.28840.groot@kde.org> <20050617081853.GG1485@dragon.NUXI.org> <200506180051.17505.groot@kde.org> <42B35EDB.1080308@speakeasy.net> In-Reply-To: <42B35EDB.1080308@speakeasy.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which motherboard for RAID in AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:08:13 -0000 Jarrod Martin wrote: > Adriaan de Groot wrote: > >> On Friday 17 June 2005 10:18, David O'Brien wrote: >> >> >>> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 05:49:28PM +0200, Adriaan de Groot wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Lots of motherboards have two RAID controllers on board. See, the VIA >>>> KT800 chipset has one and some vendors add a second, like a >>>> promise, for >>>> added value. 4 SATA connectors on the motherboard, on two different >>>> controllers. >>>> >>> >>> Why do so many motherboard manufacturers do that? Is the SiI or >>> Promise >>> RAID controller ready better than the VIA one? >>> >> > no... it isn't. you can read most of the motherboard reviews and > learn that the performance increases are slim to none for the > secondary SATA controller. in fact performance on the included SATA > controller is normally better (but by a negligible amount). > Secondary SATA normally is connected by PCI which has limited bandwidth and longer latency when comparing with chipsets built in SATA controller, Don't know how well a PCI-e based SATA controller will perform. David Xu