From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 9 13:33:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197C516A4CE for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 13:33:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout10.sul.t-online.com (mailout10.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D4543D54 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 13:33:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd11.aul.t-online.de by mailout10.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1BuAGz-0005ue-03; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:33:09 +0200 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (rAFf26ZVge3-Rz-5vu5RVaCgohQxKJZRqqld45pC9Uy3mwBGLss-EP@[217.229.208.124]) by fmrl11.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1BuAGk-1ux1hA0; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:32:54 +0200 Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) i79DWvOj037601; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:32:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:33:41 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Message-Id: <20040809153341.24963cfd@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: References: <200408080622.i786Mnhe017474@www1.pochta.ru> <20040808132524.GB1033@mehnert.org> <20040808155623.2fa6fb4b@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20040809112700.GB659@mehnert.org> <20040809150754.13ca108a@Magellan.Leidinger.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: rAFf26ZVge3-Rz-5vu5RVaCgohQxKJZRqqld45pC9Uy3mwBGLss-EP@t-dialin.net cc: Hannes Mehnert cc: FreeBSD current mailing list Subject: Re: IPSec + 5.2.current Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 13:33:13 -0000 On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 13:21:01 +0000 (UTC) "Bjoern A. Zeeb" wrote: > > > I also had some problems with IPSEC and IPSEC_ESP, changing require > > > to use in the policies fixed that. With require racoon was not able > > > to initiate phase 1, because all non esp traffic was dropped. > > whyever I hadn't seen this posting. Did you noticed Message-Id: <20040805223027.7df0732b@Magellan.Leidinger.net> on -current? > > I think this is a datapoint... I use a "require" policy too. ATM I can't > > test with "use" instead. > > but this problem had been fixed months ago for IPSEC. Any other idea for the cause of the observed behavior? Bye, Alexander. -- I'm available to get hired (preferred in .lu). http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7