Date: Fri, 25 Aug 1995 19:29:36 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> To: pst@shockwave.com (Paul Traina) Cc: current@freebsd.org, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Subject: Re: Request for bumping OSRELDATE Message-ID: <199508260229.TAA04071@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <199508260220.TAA10889@precipice.shockwave.com> from "Paul Traina" at Aug 25, 95 07:20:29 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> > Subject: Re: Request for bumping OSRELDATE > As Paul Traina wrote: > > > > >No reaction? If nobody objects, i would bump it to 199512 (certainly > > >nobody would expect 2.2 before this point). > > No, that's the whole point of the osreldate. Bump it to TODAY please, and > >>we > > can always bump it again before we ship. > > Just to avoid misunderstanding: you mean i should make it 199508 > (or ...09) now? > > Yes, exactly. Make it 08, NEVER make it higher than "today". I will affirm this possition. Setting OSRELDATE to the future is a really nasty thing to do. As is doing #ifdef's based upon an unassigned numbers (something in pcvt comes to mind). -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508260229.TAA04071>