From owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 11:22:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8F916A4CE; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:22:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549BD43D2D; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:22:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7VBMIkw080530; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:22:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i7VBMIu1057213; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:22:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7VBMIUl057212; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:22:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wb) Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:22:18 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte To: ticso@cicely.de Message-ID: <20040831112218.GB57175@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <50860.1093874782@critter.freebsd.dk> <200408301056.03499.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20040831092241.GS59909@cicely12.cicely.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040831092241.GS59909@cicely12.cicely.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-OS: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner cc: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: alpha@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3 beta1 is no go for me. X-BeenThere: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Alpha List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:22:31 -0000 On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 11:22:42AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote.. > On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 10:56:02AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Monday 30 August 2004 10:06 am, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > In message <20040830122945.GL59909@cicely12.cicely.de>, Bernd Walter > > > writes: > > > > > > It does boot the 5.0-RC1 CD I have lying around: > > > > I "fixed" the eisa code to actually include eisaconf.c on Alpha in between 5.1 > > and 5.2 I think, so the problem is likely in the eisa code rather than the > > PCI bus numbering. > > I know the EISA addition very well - I don't think anyone ever had been > running an AS1000A since that. > But after reducing the probed slot numbers Poul gets over the EISA part > and there's no other point where EISA by itself should have influences. > On the other hand we are tracking 13 month of -current development. > Not unlikely that unrelated things have changed that broke this > platform - don't you think that holes in PCI numbering could be special > to that platform and there were enough PCI and bus changes in the > last 13 month? > I can only judge the situation from the boot output and what might > come next - more guessing right now than anything else. > That includes probing pci2 and isa, but not eisa. > > Does anyone know how to find out which code triggered the trap, > whithout spreading printf? > I'm not very familar with SRM debugging features. I am not aware of any SRM debugging functionality so.. -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org