From owner-freebsd-current Sat Aug 23 16:22:04 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA20233 for current-outgoing; Sat, 23 Aug 1997 16:22:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA20227 for ; Sat, 23 Aug 1997 16:21:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id BAA25611 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 24 Aug 1997 01:21:58 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.8.7/8.8.5) id AAA14708; Sun, 24 Aug 1997 00:59:20 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19970824005920.HA61511@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Sun, 24 Aug 1997 00:59:20 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Build failure: DOSCMD uses -Bstatic -lX11 References: <199708230948.CAA06849@palrel1.hp.com> <19970823160411.14726@right.PCS> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.60_p2-3,5,8-9 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <19970823160411.14726@right.PCS>; from Jonathan Lemon on Aug 23, 1997 16:04:11 -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Jonathan Lemon wrote: > It doesn't require X11 to be built, per se. However, X11 support is a > compile-time option, so I tried to get smart, and automatically compile > in X11 support if ${X11BASE} was present. The other option would be > to always compile it without X, which I dislike. Why do you compile it static at all? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)