Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 1 Nov 2004 05:24:06 -0800
From:      Vincent Poy <vincepoy@gmail.com>
To:        Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ipfw and ipsec processing order for outgoing packets wrong
Message-ID:  <429af92e041101052447a808e6@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <429af92e041101051357fc2384@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <200410300927.51286.ari@suutari.iki.fi> <429af92e04103118435b35f235@mail.gmail.com> <016901c4bfe5$77c19d90$2508473e@sad.syncrontech.com> <429af92e041101021638e8598e@mail.gmail.com> <02d801c4c00d$24fc2a30$2508473e@sad.syncrontech.com> <429af92e041101051357fc2384@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 05:13:21 -0800, Vincent Poy <vincepoy@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:20:10 +0200, Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi> wrote:
> 
> 
> > > The counters for queue 1 keeps increasing when I do a ftp out even for
> > > non-ACK packets but the other counters for queue 2-4 doesn't move at
> > > all so it seems like everything is going out one queue instead of what
> > > the rules actually say.  I have one pipe configured as 480Kbit/sec
> > > which is what rules 63005-63008 does.
> >
> >    Are you using IPsec ?
> >
> >        Ari S.
> 
> Nope... As you can see, I'm just using ipfw2 with dummynet for
> pipe/queue just for traffic shaping.

Maybe this will explain it better as this was what my rules are based on:

http://www.topfx.com/prioritizingackfreebsd.shtml



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?429af92e041101052447a808e6>