Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:13:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Clang Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206172212440.2506@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <op.wf0i64pg34t2sn@me-pc> References: <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org> <4FCF9C07.2000607@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206161815550.41364@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <op.wf0i64pg34t2sn@me-pc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Clang is consistently faster at compiling than GCC and it is very clean and > modular -- not bloated. -r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 37025016 12 cze 21:46 /usr/bin/clang well..
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206172212440.2506>