From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Apr 18 10:30:11 1997
Return-Path: <owner-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA19941
          for stable-outgoing; Fri, 18 Apr 1997 10:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from barrow.uwaterloo.ca (sgkruk@barrow.uwaterloo.ca [129.97.140.32])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA19893
          for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 18 Apr 1997 10:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (sgkruk@localhost)
	by barrow.uwaterloo.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA04892
	for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 18 Apr 1997 13:29:49 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 13:29:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Serge G. Kruk" <sgkruk@barrow.uwaterloo.ca>
To: stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Is there a perceived need for a 2.1.8 release?
In-Reply-To: <17971.861382575@time.cdrom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.95q.970418132612.30066B-100000@barrow.uwaterloo.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 18 Apr 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:

[...]
> Anyway, given that proviso, what do those who are still running 2.1.x
> think of this?
> 
> 					Jordan

	I'm using 2.1 but already have a server on 2.2.  If 2.2 proves
stable enough for me in the next month or so, I'll switch every server to
2.2.  Therefore the answer, for me, depends on how stable will 2.2 prove
to be.  For now everything seems in great shape and I don't think I'll
need another 2.1.

Serge