Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:38:23 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" <crist.clark@attbi.com> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sorting and Matching options for ls(1) Message-ID: <20020308113823.B57999@blossom.cjclark.org> In-Reply-To: <p05101522b8aeacb55495@[128.113.24.47]>; from drosih@rpi.edu on Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 01:03:45PM -0500 References: <3C862030.9080108@softweyr.com> <20020306131141.A69228@blossom.cjclark.org> <p05101522b8aeacb55495@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 01:03:45PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 1:11 PM -0800 3/6/02, Crist J. Clark wrote: > >Since we're on the topic of ls(1) having too few options, what I'd > >really like is a switch to print the creation, modified, and access > >times together. Basically, dumping the whole stat(2) structure would > >be nice (some other UNIXes have a separate command to do this). > > I like the suggestion for -M and -S for 'ls'. I also like the > idea of something that could dump the entire stat structure, but > that strikes me as being better as a separate utility. What do > the other unixes call their command which does this? IIRC, the first time I ran into such a thing was IRIX, and I found it very useful. Here is their stat(1M) manpage, http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?coll=0650&db=man&fname=/usr/share/catman/a_man/cat1/stat.z -- Crist J. Clark | cjclark@alum.mit.edu | cjclark@jhu.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | cjc@freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020308113823.B57999>