From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 30 17:18:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361FE37B401; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:18:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-104-32.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.104.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F1843FEC; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:17:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1145C66B9B; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:17:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 965B7781; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:17:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:17:54 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dominic Marks Message-ID: <20030701001754.GA72598@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <200306301406.h5UE6Zdd013151@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030630211935.GA71572@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030630220229.GA58820@cus.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030630220229.GA58820@cus.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Daichi GOTO cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/dovecot pkg-install ports/mail/dovecot/files README.FreeBSD patch-dovecot-example.conf X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 00:18:03 -0000 --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 11:02:29PM +0100, Dominic Marks wrote: > > Don't forget to register these in the porter's handbook so there are > > no uid/gid conflicts with other ports. >=20 > I'm a little confused. Does this apply for users and groups were the > actual numbers don't matter ? In Dovecot the extra user is just used > as a seperate identity to partition login, authentication and active > users securely. Or do should all users and groups which are going to > be added by a port by listed in the Porters Handbook. The handbook > itself seems to suggest the former. So there is nothing in the port or package that hard-codes the value of the uid at compile or package-time, for example files owned by the dovecot user? If not, it's probably OK. Kris P.S. NB, your port does not remove the user/group at deinstall-time. --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/ANMxWry0BWjoQKURAp7lAJ4qipu0qp5/k7F1jQLUbc2yI+JkxgCgwHsE bgjMWx9+gv7oXKT8L53vCdw= =A3GE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--