From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 29 11:52:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBA316A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:52:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34D943FE1 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:52:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from runaround.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA00201; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:51:56 -0700 (MST) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20031029125059.04d830e0@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:51:53 -0700 To: Erick Mechler From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <20031029173607.GN58963@techometer.net> References: <200310291641.JAA27852@lariat.org> <20031029173607.GN58963@techometer.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:52:01 -0000 At 10:36 AM 10/29/2003, Erick Mechler wrote: >I see you ask this question on a somewhat regular basis about FreeBSD >4.X-{STABLE,RELEASE). Why not just get a spare system you can put online >somewhere and do your own burn-in testing? Because I'm a very small sample. ;-) I'm looking for consensus, as well as for warnings about hardware I haven't tried with it yet. --Brett