From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org  Sat Sep 19 11:51:57 2015
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C99A030DD;
 Sat, 19 Sep 2015 11:51:57 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B4E1A4F;
 Sat, 19 Sep 2015 11:51:57 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org)
Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id 532381C2C; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 11:51:57 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 11:51:57 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: marino@freebsd.org
Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@com.bat.ru>,
 Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org,
 svn-ports-all <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>,
 svn-ports-head <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r396998 - head/net/samba36
Message-ID: <20150919115157.GA99928@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201509151622.t8FGMXQY074723@repo.freebsd.org>
 <CALdFvJE17udNUQ=Y5JxwHphn2TWRMh-213_LfP-YOM3MN1Qx2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <0FAE77426236E9E47E15BFC1@atuin.in.mat.cc>
 <20150919072048.GA86129@FreeBSD.org> <55FD0FA4.7050306@marino.st>
 <20150919074241.GA96797@FreeBSD.org> <55FD3620.7060500@marino.st>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55FD3620.7060500@marino.st>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 11:51:57 -0000

On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:17:04PM +0200, John Marino wrote:
> On 9/19/2015 9:42 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > I'm fine with clear and umabiguous rules too.  I just want bumping rules
> > to become more granular.  Plain "package changed -> need a bump" means
> > that fixing a typo in pkg-descr would require it.  Don't you think this
> > is a bit too extreme?
> 
> I think there is already an exception for metadata changes such as
> pkg-descr and COMMENT and MAINTAINER, although I don't know if this
> exception is documented (it is done in practice).  However shebang fixes
> are functional and definitely need a bump.  They can be the difference
> between functioning and non-functioning packages.

Right; however, in this particular case it was *examples* what were fixed,
which in fact are not ready to be run on FreeBSD as is.  I can totaly see
why Timur got upset about this particular bump.

./danfe