Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:53:44 +0200 From: Dimitar Vasilev <dimitar.vassilev@gmail.com> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> Cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new porstnap mirror Message-ID: <59adc1a0912110853p2b2cab30sd91504bb264d79f0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20091211163417.GB33056@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <59adc1a0912110158j156706d7m1fa7b25002f61edb@mail.gmail.com> <a78074950912110216y240d0d1br36d2b3a4e1e69768@mail.gmail.com> <59adc1a0912110732v515346eeq4ce82830f5b75618@mail.gmail.com> <4B2266AE.1050705@sk.FreeBSD.org> <20091211163417.GB33056@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/12/11 Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 04:35:10PM +0100, Juraj Lutter wrote: > > Dimitar Vasilev wrote: > >>> > >> I'm located in Bulgaria and to be honest one user asked. > >> So far my regular patients are a news agency, 2-3 private hospitals, > some > >> Turkish government servers, 2-3 telcos > >> and the regular FBSD bunch - 100-200 local people plus the various stray > >> bunch from around the world. > >> We will see how it goes. > > > > Just my $0.02, I often install machines in local offices connected via > > 1-to-2 Mbps ADSL lines and fetching snapshot at speed like 100kB/s is not > > really good to look at ;-) > > On an internal network it's possible to have a single machine do the > fetch and then share /var/db/portsnap via read-only nfs. This will be > much more bandwidth efficent than maintaining an actual mirror. > > -- Brooks > Hi guys, just to clarify and avoid further misunderstandings: I'm one of the persons maintaining the bg.freebsd.org. I'd like to add port-snap as a service if possible and be included in a pool like eu.portsnap.FreeBSD.org. Speaking PGP if needed. Thanks and have a nice week-end! Best regards, Dimitar Vassilev
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?59adc1a0912110853p2b2cab30sd91504bb264d79f0>