From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 25 12:34:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (ringworld.nanolink.com [195.24.48.189]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 642A037B402 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 12:34:29 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 3072 invoked by uid 1000); 25 Jan 2001 20:32:57 -0000 Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 22:32:57 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev To: Terry Lambert Cc: clefevre@noos.fr, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: patch for bsd.lib.mk to create include and lib dirs Message-ID: <20010125223257.I1122@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: Terry Lambert , clefevre@noos.fr, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20010124231628.A442@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <200101252018.NAA27092@usr08.primenet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200101252018.NAA27092@usr08.primenet.com>; from tlambert@primenet.com on Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 08:18:54PM +0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 08:18:54PM +0000, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > would not be better to use install -d instead of mkdir -p which permit, > > > if needed alsewhere, to also set ownership ? > > > > D'oh.. great idea! This simplifies things, because there's no need > > for the sys.mk patch to define MKDIR; INSTALL is already defined. > > > > New patch attached. > > Question: are these changes using portable, or FreeBSD specific > options? > > The reason I ask is because of www.openpackages.org... If you mean my patch, it only uses -d, -o and -g. AFAIK, -o and -g are portable; GNU install has -d, I have no experience with install on other platforms. G'luck, Peter -- I am jealous of the first word in this sentence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message