From owner-freebsd-doc Wed Apr 4 6:45:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (pc-62-31-42-141-hy.blueyonder.co.uk [62.31.42.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F386A37B71A for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 06:45:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk) Received: (from nik@localhost) by nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f34Dddi26400; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 14:39:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from nik) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 14:39:39 +0100 From: Nik Clayton To: Udo Erdelhoff Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Translators: Need feedback on FAQ reorganization Message-ID: <20010404143938.A6408@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> References: <20010313124524.B2130@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20010313231654.G83336@nathan.ruhr.de> <20010314131233.C6138@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20010314210730.J83336@nathan.ruhr.de> <20010315023806.B46684@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20010315200337.N83336@nathan.ruhr.de> <20010315210350.A1113@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20010316104207.H24155@django.de.uu.net> <20010316190808.A389@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20010326054147.D31676@nathan.ruhr.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010326054147.D31676@nathan.ruhr.de>; from ue@nathan.ruhr.de on Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:41:47AM +0200 Organization: FreeBSD Project Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:41:47AM +0200, Udo Erdelhoff wrote: > > That's certainly one way to do things. Until we get more committers I > > wouldn't be surprised if it was quite an effective way. >=20 > It is effective - and it makes your "good record of getting PRs committed" > criterium absolutely worthless. No it doesn't. Apart from anything else, it demonstrates commitment. > > > right now I'm resting my case on the point that existing code is one = of > > > the better arguments :-> >=20 > > Attached is a diff to freebsd.dsl which rewrites Norm's > > xref-biblioentry function, and a diff to the FAQ to use it. >=20 > I'll take a close look at it (and the html codes it generates) once I've > managed to clean up the collateral damage caused by revision 1.155 of the > FAQ. What collateral damage? It's a 50 line diff, of which only 22 lines are actual changes. Clearly I'm misunderstanding something about the processes you're using if that's causing problems. N --=20 FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.freebsd.org/ FreeBSD Documentation Project http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/ --- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F 94B7 93A8 0764 2C37 E375 --- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjrLJBkACgkQk6gHZCw343X+0gCdEFn4lwWegkvwHGbk5tEvA39w CdQAn1Fk2IlVlok0QAa/9s9f0kwaBDdS =+m88 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message