From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 13:19:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8000142; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:19:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76201889; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r15DJAwO045243; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:19:10 GMT (envelope-from linimon@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r15DJAVT045239; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:19:10 GMT (envelope-from linimon) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:19:10 GMT Message-Id: <201302051319.r15DJAVT045239@freefall.freebsd.org> To: linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org From: linimon@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/175852: [amd64] [patch] in_cksum_hdr() behaves differently on amd64 vs i386 with unaligned data X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:19:10 -0000 Old Synopsis: in_cksum_hdr() behaves differently on amd64 vs i386 with unaligned data New Synopsis: [amd64] [patch] in_cksum_hdr() behaves differently on amd64 vs i386 with unaligned data Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-amd64->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 5 13:17:43 UTC 2013 Responsible-Changed-Why: Even though this is an amd64-specific patch, I'm going to try to assign it to the networking mailing list since it affects the networking code. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=175852