From owner-freebsd-current Sun Feb 28 8:48:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA1D15244 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 08:48:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA23596; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 16:47:58 GMT Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id JAA80190; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:48:35 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199902281648.JAA80190@harmony.village.org> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: gcc Cc: Chuck Robey , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 27 Feb 1999 22:19:09 PST." <20655.920182749@zippy.cdrom.com> References: <20655.920182749@zippy.cdrom.com> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:48:35 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20655.920182749@zippy.cdrom.com> "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: : > I for one would love to see 2.8.1 or newer in the tree for my own, : > selfish reasons. Many ports (new architectures) would benefit from : > this. : : Is that to say that you prefer it over egcs 1.1.1? If so, why? No. I'd love to see 2.8.1 or newer. egcs 1.1.1 is newer. I'd prefer egcs, for a variety of reasons... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message