From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 29 10:39:37 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B9616A41F
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:39:37 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9F843D5C
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:39:19 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9A01A3C32;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 02:39:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id A70F15158D; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:39:15 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:39:15 -0500
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Eirik ?verby <ltning@anduin.net>
Message-ID: <20051129103915.GA43088@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <84dead720511280654j138635abgcb9cc0978e6c26b7@mail.gmail.com>
	<02757598-222D-408E-8B33-C2EE1E6E426E@anduin.net>
	<20051128211440.GB28963@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<3A601A32-94D1-49F6-AB06-ED54D50D4B6A@anduin.net>
	<20051128235911.GA31669@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20051129094531.Y23958@anduin.net>
	<20051129091533.GA41885@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<C8244498-F58F-4CCD-9BA5-7B9E19EAD517@anduin.net>
	<84dead720511290144g6e2af749re5e171fe7e6112a5@mail.gmail.com>
	<FEC2AAE5-1AEB-486D-8934-E17068D142F2@anduin.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <FEC2AAE5-1AEB-486D-8934-E17068D142F2@anduin.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Joseph Koshy <joseph.koshy@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Reduced java/tomcat performance 6-beta3 -> 6-stable ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:39:37 -0000


--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:48:33AM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2005, at 10:44 , Joseph Koshy wrote:
>=20
> >E?> Yea yea ;) Working on it..
> >E?> Is there a way to force ACPI-safe on the slower system?
> >
> ># sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware=3D<one of the values from
> >kern.timecounter.choice>
>=20
> kern.timecounter.choice: TSC(-100) ACPI-fast(1000) i8254(0) dummy=20
> (-1000000)
>=20
> ACPI-safe is not among the choices. Which means I can't choose it, I =20
> presume.
> I'm compiling up new kernels with ACPI_DEBUG right now, once they are =20
> installed, what can I do to determine differences in DSDT tables =20
> etc.? Or whatever else is different?

There is documentation somewhere on www.freebsd.org about how to
obtain necessary ACPI debugging information...sorry, I don't remember
specifically where, maybe in the handbook or elsewhere in the docs
section.

Kris


--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDjC/TWry0BWjoQKURAo6CAKCS3XPmgVMyaRfA4xq7bRy+1mMy9wCfcOy1
z7q9AhGo4cTnApyedBQv8sM=
=Ojis
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe--