From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 11:06:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A260816A4CF for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:06:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA15143D41 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:06:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andreas.kohn@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 2355 invoked by uid 65534); 26 Jul 2004 11:06:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [212.204.44.203]) (212.204.44.203) by mail.gmx.net (mp005) with SMTP; 26 Jul 2004 13:06:33 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2431876 From: Andreas Kohn To: Eric Anholt In-Reply-To: <1090609869.2748.23.camel@leguin> References: <1090609869.2748.23.camel@leguin> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-GHHkkVzcIlKALuFwFQ2Q" Message-Id: <1090839986.16164.3.camel@klamath.syndrom23.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:06:26 +0200 cc: x11@FreeBSD.org cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: X.Org conversion X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:06:36 -0000 --=-GHHkkVzcIlKALuFwFQ2Q Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 21:11, Eric Anholt wrote: > OK, the final version of the X.Org conversion patch has hit the tree.=20 > No ports appear to be broken by the upgrade at this time. X.Org has > been made the default X distribution on -current. Other versions of > FreeBSD retain the same default X distribution (XFree86) but can upgrade > by setting X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=3Dxorg in /etc/make.conf. Would it be helpful to let mergemaster check if a X_WINDOW_SYSTEM setting is in make.conf when updating -CURRENT? A simple alert for the user that he should decide would suffice I think. Regards, -- Andreas Kohn --=-GHHkkVzcIlKALuFwFQ2Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBBOWyYucd7Ow1ygwRAsC3AJ0ZbF3Xu4Z9VfgqqOjSbYBxjyO2sgCfUeJc Er9fhYDeKC3SqjtkjNA4z6k= =yf0z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-GHHkkVzcIlKALuFwFQ2Q--