From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 10 12:07:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D839B16A4CE for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 12:07:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (73.Red-213-97-200.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.200.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB4843FBF for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 12:07:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org) Received: from scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org (scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org [192.168.100.1]) by mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90D603581E; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:07:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:07:27 +0100 From: Miguel Mendez To: Will Andrews Message-Id: <20031110210727.6c8a6ebc.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20031110163623.GC93583@procyon.firepipe.net> References: <1068458390.38101.19.camel@dirk.no.domain> <20031110152000.622db381.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <1068471598.38101.77.camel@dirk.no.domain> <20031110163623.GC93583@procyon.firepipe.net> Organization: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.5-gtk2-20030906 (GTK+ 2.2.4; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: boris@brooknet.com.au cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ability for maintainers to update own ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:07:31 -0000 On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:36:24 -0800 Will Andrews wrote: > Sorry, but if you are unhappy with the speed at which ports get > updated, become a regular and you'll get a commit bit. It's just > that simple. For most maintainers it's not worth the effort > because practice makes a better porter. That's only partially true, and hardly something I'd call a solution. You already know that a lot of ports people only take care of their own ports, so that only helps perpetuating the situation. Something like NetBSD's pkgsrc-wip would work IF commiters had an active role and stuff was merged on a regular basis. Just my HO. Cheers, -- Miguel Mendez http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org