From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Mar  9 23:23:27 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id XAA07938 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 23:23:27 -0800
Received: from netcom14.netcom.com (hasty@netcom14.netcom.com [192.100.81.126]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA07932 for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 23:23:26 -0800
Received: by netcom14.netcom.com (8.6.10/Netcom)
	id XAA06607; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 23:22:10 -0800
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 23:22:10 -0800
From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr)
Message-Id: <199503100722.XAA06607@netcom14.netcom.com>
To: davidg@Root.COM, gary@wcs.uq.oz.au
Subject: Re: SNAP or current?
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>   Umm, I wouldn't count on the next SNAP being too stable. I have a dozen
>serious bugs (panics or system hangs) on the whiteboard, and I don't expect

Care to elaborate ?

Mostly because I am not seeing any panics over here (cross my fingers) and
perhaps they could be due to a driver or option configured in the kernel.

Regards,
	Amancio