Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:20:42 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 212004] net/freerdp: Update to 2.0.0.d Message-ID: <bug-212004-13-1eepyZm6UM@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-212004-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-212004-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D212004 --- Comment #16 from Kyle Evans <bsdports@kyle-evans.net> --- (In reply to Dmitry Marakasov from comment #15) 1.) Cool! I hadn't tried just listing it in the plist as gzip'd and letting= the framework work it out on its own- that's really nifty. Thanks! 2.) Fixing 3.) Fixing 4.) Fair enough- the version bump seemed kind of arbitrary in the first pla= ce, but I do like the idea of adding it as net/freerdp-devel. I'll play around = with net/vinagre a little bit just to verify, even though it won't be as crucial= if this gets re-introduced as net/freerdp-devel. The other one (net/remmina-plugin-rdp) is BROKEN and presumably what Antenore aims to add= ress after this update. What somewhat bothers me, though, is that I'm afraid we'll get in a state w= here net/freerdp will never actually be updated given the sparse upstream releas= es, the last couple of which are beta releases from 2 and 3 years ago. Then, we= 'll eventually (and possibly in the not-so-distant future) get to a point where= it makes more sense to just replace net/freerdp with net/freerdp-devel. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-212004-13-1eepyZm6UM>