From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 27 18:16:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D771DB84550 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 18:16:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x22e.google.com (mail-it0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1DFC287E for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 18:16:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id f6so68204754ith.0 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:16:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Bq/qsJIqV4tfCGnc79ioHdW+DsAk935pABJCCovb0EY=; b=jquwWsIVPod0ynCsi1PEbefB70TS8ZJAQ8kYO49y9aaNIZjXKS/Kw6+2WDvAMXzvgi xi01Zq2IDGmzj4SKrVmB2Numl7xUcwlvIBicyqxSVNhiQ6VxwahnhHtX0ZWTzxABNLbu uALf3u1N7VKvttbBrdiS2QgLu+IzBDYR5q2OEevT6gHKODBSHrV0+c6wVsDzQ/r076hW lE/VwvQA4SmBwRbW0g3TQoq6g/vLpQW9JUeU/kf8bwjqlr/MHWgNbTA9Rva2PaBd8W7X Ijzg5mj2LnROfl2fgtRv+rMYL2GALu26eZwFh7qmJOYhWhk2ZnybC/5xd0VUJGk1/JPJ Jg9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Bq/qsJIqV4tfCGnc79ioHdW+DsAk935pABJCCovb0EY=; b=eapJpN5osaL/dk6+R8njursjhfsfRZ6P1mUKk3AJJ2kSQwaAawjwp0weMvfeUj8WHr vLP4/Lk1H0rkqlyAAZ86zwhnYceHFpJHVY0NIs75sX4RIflJougb/h4LV8w8o8Dk21nx axI+QJDVDWSNPmBvNa2L1g63zmM3Mwp7E/xYRCnBRwWw/jx7BGvBs8KG9BpJs9msquuQ FJCY3JVEbFJjt0YMILv5baCBB6StlzTpGd/PvlzPnr/G0eh2eIXu0D7n4nyf9B+e78wx OXjz5fq5E62eqye6sxgZ5ezieUsVu9/d1ohFmETo/4EOA8YumP+ci7qbTQu87kLS3C5g 9kig== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLXGjIYTjOpJs3BUySHvrJqczTJqZRDZOCKN/Px32eMPHKXJsuPOvuAP3WeYC1b8T0cmVCrJkxQh/1RvA== X-Received: by 10.36.111.72 with SMTP id x69mr9217642itb.71.1467051377084; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:16:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.36.210.212 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:16:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20160627170619.GB28353@athena.sysfault.org> From: Adrian Chadd Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:16:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bad rtwn(0) performance with RTL8188CE on -CURRENT after r302035 To: =?UTF-8?B?T3RhY8OtbGlv?= Cc: freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 18:16:17 -0000 Heh, there isn't any 11n support in rtwn (and won't be until I unify rtwn and urtwn post-11.) I'll go find the rtwn NIC and see if I can figure out what's going on. -a On 27 June 2016 at 10:21, Otac=C3=ADlio wrote: > Em 27/06/2016 14:06, Marcus von Appen escreveu: >> >> Hi, >> >> thanks to previous efforts, the rtwn(0) connection for my RTL8188CE >> wireless card is far more stable. It seems to come at the price of >> relatively bad performance, though. After r302035 from avos@, I >> can't get more than 500 kbit/s downstream from anywhere. >> >> Let me know, what information is necessary to isolate and correct >> that issue. I'll gladly test it. :-) >> >> Cheers >> Marcus > > > I have helped doing some tests with the urtwn. You can try creating the > interface with -ht parameter. Here this improves performance. > > []'s > > -Otac=C3=ADlio > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= "