Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:16:16 -0700
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>
To:        =?UTF-8?B?T3RhY8OtbGlv?= <otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br>
Cc:        freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Bad rtwn(0) performance with RTL8188CE on -CURRENT after r302035
Message-ID:  <CAJ-Vmo=FMEEc=T094k6sW4WW3KnjCL6OSarvT=QA2e38XofX_Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <bacdd981-d5a6-18c9-af35-55912237bd60@bsd.com.br>
References:  <20160627170619.GB28353@athena.sysfault.org> <bacdd981-d5a6-18c9-af35-55912237bd60@bsd.com.br>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Heh, there isn't any 11n support in rtwn (and won't be until I unify
rtwn and urtwn post-11.)

I'll go find the rtwn NIC and see if I can figure out what's going on.



-a


On 27 June 2016 at 10:21, Otac=C3=ADlio <otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br> wrote:
> Em 27/06/2016 14:06, Marcus von Appen escreveu:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks to previous efforts, the rtwn(0) connection for my RTL8188CE
>> wireless card is far more stable. It seems to come at the price of
>> relatively bad performance, though. After r302035 from avos@, I
>> can't get more than 500 kbit/s downstream from anywhere.
>>
>> Let me know, what information is necessary to isolate and correct
>> that issue. I'll gladly test it. :-)
>>
>> Cheers
>> Marcus
>
>
> I have helped doing some tests with the urtwn. You can try creating the
> interface with -ht parameter. Here this improves performance.
>
> []'s
>
> -Otac=C3=ADlio
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org=
"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=FMEEc=T094k6sW4WW3KnjCL6OSarvT=QA2e38XofX_Q>